Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in (State) B distribution business.

On June 15, 2017, at around 11:00, the Defendant issued an instruction to the head of the management office without the authority of the victim E to give instructions to the head of the management office without the authority of the victim E within the office of management of Kimpo-si C building D, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on the ground that it is bad for the victim E to give instructions to the head of the management office without the authority of the management office of the victim. “Around June 15, 2017, the Defendant shall not enter the victim, upon entering the gue, such as the flab, and the flab, if the flab, such as the flab, was not entitled to enter, and the flab, paid the management expenses.

In the case of a person who pays the cost of management, only the person who pays the cost of management, the victim was openly insultd by Mara Mara Mara Mana, Y Ma Mana Mana Mana Mana, and Mana Mana Mana Mana Mana Mara, Mara Mana Mara Mara, Mara Mara Mana Mana Mana Ma

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement by a witness E and F [the defendant and his defense counsel only made the victim the statement to the extent that the defendant only made the victim the statement to the extent that he did not have any ever made the victim’s “Ise Ma”, “snish Nae Na,” and “Ise Hase Hase” and “Ise Hase Hase Mase ma,” and the Defendant’s expression constitutes a little and indecent and indecent expression but it does not constitute insult.

The argument is asserted.

In light of the following circumstances that can be seen by health stand-off and evidence: ① the victim has consistently and specifically stated the details of the crime from the investigative agency to the present court; ② the testimony to the effect that the Defendant took a bath to the same, ② the testimony corresponds to the victim’s statement; ③ the statement of the witness G who made the testimony favorable to the Defendant and the details of the written confirmation of the fact submitted by the Defendant are difficult to believe it as it is in light of the relationship between the Defendant and G, etc.