1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s principal claim added in the trial, shall be as follows:

1. The reasoning for this part of the court’s explanation is as follows: (a) except where “the result of the CD verification by this court” in Section 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be “the result of the CD verification by the court of first instance”; and (b) the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance

2. The fact that there is no dispute over the scope of the liability for damages [based on recognition], the statement of Gap evidence 5, 6, Eul evidence 3 and 4, the result of the request for the examination of the body of the first instance court to Daegu Tol Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings.

A. (1) Property damage (1) lost income: Personal information 17,782,962 won 1): D students and South (64 years old at the time of the accident) operation period: By June 22, 2017, which was 3 years after the date of the accident, the victim was 64 years old at the time of the accident, but it was actually able to obtain income by engaging in the same occupation for 3 years from the date of the accident in consideration of the fact that the victim was 64 years old at the time of the accident.

(2) 86,86 won for the first half of the year 2015 (3) 89,56 won for the second half of the year 2014 x 20. 3. 5 days for the first half of the year 2015 x 20. 5 days for the first half of the year 2016 x 3. 5 days for the first half of the year 2016 x 20. 5 days for the first half of the year 2016 x 3. 5 days for the first half of the year : 20. 5 x 20. 5 days for the first half of the year x 20. 5 days for the first half of the year x 20. 3 days for the first half of the year x 20. 9 days for the first half of the year x 20. 9 days for the second half of the year x 2014 x 3. 97. x 1. x 25 days