logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2005. 12. 20. 선고 2005누6326 판결
[부가가치세부과처분취소][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff (Attorney Kim Jae- Promotion, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Head of Yongsan Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 6, 2005

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap34995 decided Feb. 15, 2005

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The disposition of imposition of value-added tax amounting to KRW 13,936,600 on March 2, 2004 by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on March 15, 2004 (to be deemed to be a clerical error as stated in the complaint) shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Jin-jin (Presiding Judge)

arrow