logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2005. 12. 27. 선고 2005누6982 판결
[주거이전비및이사비지급청구][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Haunnam

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Attorney Park Chang-chul, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 13, 2005

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2004Guhap32609 Decided March 3, 2005

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay 7,000,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. Purport of appeal

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Jin-jin (Presiding Judge)

arrow