logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.11.12 2013고단1254
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B, on September 13, 2013, was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the branch court of the Daegu District Court. At present, the appellate court of Daegu District Court (2013No3061) is pending in the trial of the appellate court (2013No3061). Defendant C was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the branch court of the Daegu District Court on September 13, 2013, and currently the appellate court of Daegu District Court (2013No3061) is pending in the trial of the appellate court

Defendant

A is the head of the F Institute in Daegu-gu and G who is the head of the F Institute and the head of the F Institute. Defendant B and Defendant C are industrial accident workers who have received vocational training at the said Institute.

If an industrial accident worker is receiving a vocational training from a vocational training institution and the attendance rate is not less than 80/100, the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation shall pay an industrial accident worker a vocational training allowance equivalent to the minimum wage for the period during which he is unable to be employed due to the vocational training, and pay the vocational training

1. The Defendant abused the system for vocational training allowances and vocational training costs, thereby pretending to have the attendance rate of FK, which is an industrial accident worker, concluded with the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service with the victim, to be paid vocational training allowances and vocational training costs by the victim as if the attendance rate is at least 80/100.

The facts of industrial accident C are that the defendant was signed by the FSC and returned immediately to the workplace, and there is no fact that the above school received vocational training at all.

Nevertheless, the Defendant filed a claim for vocational training allowances and vocational training expenses by transmitting the same as the above C had attended at least 80/100 of the vocational training process of the above private teaching institute during the month of October 2010 to the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service for the victims, claiming for vocational training allowances and vocational training expenses from the victims.

arrow