Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Criminal facts

D is a person who operates the “F Education Center” in Jeonju-si E, Jeonju-si, and the Defendants are working as a training instructor at the above Education Center.

The Ministry of Labor for victims' employment shall provide workers who are subscribed to employment insurance for the improvement of their vocational ability, severance from employment, and self-development with some support according to the attendance rate of up to two million won per year when they receive vocational training from the workplace skill development training institution for workers, the total attendance rate of at least 80%, and the total attendance rate of less than 80%.

D Based on the fact that the injured party does not closely check whether the trainee was present or not, it is required that the trainee be falsely entered in the attendance book as if the trainee was present, or that the trainee was submitted and kept with the card for verifying the attendance of the trainee (hereinafter “one day learning card”) and falsely recorded the situation of attendance by means of display on the device, etc., and that the trainee submitted false attendance cards, etc. to the public official in charge of the injured party who submitted the false attendance book, etc. to make the trainee appear as if the attendance rate of 80% or more, and request the training instructor of the above education center, such as Defendant A, etc. to receive the training fee, and request the training instructor of the above education center to make false entry into the attendance book. Accordingly, Defendant A et al., upon receiving the training fee from the injured party by the above method, concluded that the training instructor of the above education center, including Defendant A, had 60% among them and D had 40% or more of D, etc.

1. Defendant A: (a) from May 7, 2014 to April 7, 2015, the Defendant entered the call-up card at “G” with his/her own lecture four times in total as shown in the [Attachment 2] list of crimes; (b) entered the call-out status card as if the students who did not actually attend, or entered them falsely in the attendance book; and (c) D filed a claim for vocational skills development training fees with the previous principal branch office with the victim’s former branch office based on the aforementioned false call-out status.