logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고단133
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of eight months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of six months, Defendant D and E, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating "K Lifelong Education Center" in the Jeonju-siJ, and Defendant B, C, D, E, L, M, N, andO are those working for the above Education Center as a training instructor.

The Ministry of Labor for victims' employment provides workers who have subscribed to employment insurance with vocational training from the workplace skill development training institution for the improvement of their vocational ability, severance from employment, and self-development, with some support according to the attendance rate, if the attendance rate is at least 80% per year, and if the number of workers is less than 80%, the total amount shall be provided.

Defendant

A by taking advantage of the fact that the Ministry of Labor does not carefully check whether the trainee was present or not, the Minister of Labor made the trainee enter the attendance book falsely as if the trainee did not attend the attendance, or he received and kept the card for verifying the attendance (one day card) from the trainee, and made the attendance status falsely by means of using the device at will. The public official in charge of the Ministry of Labor of the Ministry of Labor submitted false attendance records, etc., and demanded the training instructor of the above education center, such as the defendant B, etc. to receive the training fee by suggesting that the trainee's attendance rate is more than 80%, and the training instructor of the above education center, such as the defendant B, etc., received the training fee by the above method, and the training instructor of the above education center, such as the defendant B, etc., received the training fee from the Ministry of Labor, and gathered that the training instructor of the above education center had 60% out of it, and Defendant A 40% of it.

1. Defendant A

A. From May 1, 2014 to June 24, 2014, the Defendant stated a false appearance as if a student P did not appear in the process of the education center at the above K Lifelong Education Center, even if the student P was not present at the meeting, and subsequently, up to 70 times in total from May 1, 2014 to April 28, 2015.

arrow