A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 13, 2017, at around 03:20, the Defendant: (a) leased a telephone machine located in the Guro-si in the said restaurant and used it; (b) was demanded by the victim E (48 years of age) who is the owner of the said restaurant to return the telephone phone; (c) the Defendant expressed that he was able to say that he was able to read, “this sing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . f. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. 40 minutes of the instant restaurant, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant’s business by force by avoiding disturbances over about 40 minutes, and let the customers on the table get out of it.

2. On September 13, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, assaulting the owner of a restaurant at the place indicated in paragraph 1 at around 04:25, and “the Defendant assaulted the owner of the restaurant.”

“Absing” is required to return home from G, who is a police officer of the F District Police Station of the former U.S. police station, dispatched upon receipt of a report 112 report, and is demanded by G, a police officer of the F District Police Station, to do so. Nices will do so.

Neither is the president of the Republic of Korea.

A bitch bitch bitch bitch.

Recognizing “Absing the face of the said G two times in drinking,” and assaulting the face of the said G.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. A H statement;

1. A copy of the work site of the F World Trade Organization;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation report (in relation to on-site conditions, etc., hearing of witness's statements and suspect's words and actions on the damaged field);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant, on November 10, 2016, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on November 10, 2016.