A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol at the “F for the operation of the Victim E, which is located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu” restaurant; (b) took a bath in a large voice to other employees; and (c) took a time for customers who are taking meals; and (d) was the victim who prevented him/her from taking advantage of his/her son’s death; and (b) was the victim who saw him/her from taking advantage of his/her son’s death.

“...”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. Around December 6, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above site; the Defendant was informed of his disturbance from the security guards belonging to the Heung Police Station of the Daejeon District, Daejeon, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a report of 112 that the Defendant avoided disturbance; and the Defendant was informed of the Defendant’s removal from the security guards belonging to the Heung Police Station of the Daejeon District, who was called to the site; and the Defendant “packed the Defendant, who was able to breath, and boomed the I’s breath by breath, and was tight

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, J, I, K, and G;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Written statements of E and J, and K’s self-written statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest the occurrence of the case, report on investigation (Interference with the performance of public duties), photographs of damaged parts, report on the handling of the case, list of the cases of 112 reported, place of work in the H district, CCTV images and voice recording files with the video images and mobile phones;

1. The relevant criminal facts, Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing business performance), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including observation of protection, community service order, and order to attend lectures;

1. The second crime (Interference with the performance of official duties) in the mitigated area (one month to eight months), where the mitigated area (one month to eight months), such as assault, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or interference with official duties, is minor, the second crime (in the case of a person subject to special mitigation) (in the case of a minor degree of interference with the performance of official duties) in the sentencing guidelines for the first crime (in the scope of a recommendation), the scope of interference with the performance of official duties.