1. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of appointment and revocation of dismissal under 2017-63 between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University (hereinafter “instant University”).

B. On August 14, 200, while the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was newly appointed and served as a full-time lecturer at the university of this case on August 24, 2004, the Defendant refused to be reappointed on August 24, 2004, filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation thereof. The Defendant revoked the disposition rejecting the reappointment on January 10, 2005, and left the U.S. post after reinstatement on February 14, 2005.

C. In the instant university, the first professor of industry-academic cooperation and the first professor of industry-academic cooperation in 2013 were selected. The said university’s personnel committee decided to specially employ the Intervenor as a major professor of education on February 20, 2013, and the Plaintiff was appointed as an assistant professor of the instant university as of March 1, 2013 upon the conclusion of the contract with the Intervenor on February 28, 2013.

On the other hand, as the Plaintiff’s board of directors demanded a resolution on disciplinary action against the Intervenor on March 31, 2016, the Plaintiff requested a resolution on disciplinary action against the Intervenor on April 7, 2016. Accordingly, the teachers’ disciplinary committee held on May 9, 2016, refers to standardizing the ability necessary to successfully perform the industrial field’s duties at a national level.

As a person in charge of the management and supervision of the accounts of specialized promotion projects as a person in charge of the development of curriculum and E-learning, the Minister of NCS Support Center has decided to dismiss the Intervenor on the ground of disciplinary reasons such as failure to comply with the duty of prohibition of job evasion (unauthorized absence) and failure to submit lectures and reinforcement plans. Accordingly, the Plaintiff dismissed the Intervenor on May 18, 2016.

(hereinafter “former dismissal disposition of this case”). (e)

The intervenor previously dismissed the plaintiff.