1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision;

A. On March 1, 2002, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was newly appointed as D University established and operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “instant university”) as a construction engineering and a full-time lecturer at a public college, and served as an associate professor in the said department.

B. Around May 2012, the university of this case was notified on April 24, 2012 that the investigation of the Intervenor’s occupational embezzlement and the suspicion of fraud was initiated.

C. After that, on December 13, 2012, the prosecutor of the Gun Office in the Jeonju District Prosecutors’ Office prosecuted the Intervenor on the registration of false assistant researchers, money for goods, fraud related to the management of subsidies, violation of the Subsidy Management Act, occupational embezzlement, and perjury. On July 22, 2015, the Gun Office in the Jeonju District Court sentenced the Intervenor to a fine of KRW 7 million due to a violation of the Act on Fraud and Subsidy Management, and found the Intervenor not guilty of the part concerning occupational embezzlement and perjury among the facts charged against the Intervenor.

[Judgment of the first instance court of this case] (hereinafter “instant judgment”). - In the way of falsely registering the auxiliary researchers, an intervenor in violation of the Act on Fraudulent and Subsidy Management by registering the said researchers, a total of 48 times from April 26, 2011 to April 18, 2012, is granted KRW 28,718,240 to KRW 28,629,753, a total of 48 times during the same period, at the same time, a sum of 28,629,753 national subsidies by two universities and industry-academic cooperation foundations, such as the Hanju District University and the Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, a victim, was granted from 28,718,240 won.

- The fraud intervenor related to the price of goods was issued KRW 22 million from the university of this case on February 28, 2012 by deceiving the person in charge of purchase of goods belonging to the university of this case, the victim of which was the victim, in collusion with E, as if he produced and supplied the small and medium-sized c Cases engineering research institute owned by the c cases engineering research institute.

The university of this case is an intervenor.