1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (i) On March 1, 1986, an intervenor was appointed as a vocational name university B and a full-time lecturer established and operated by the plaintiff as of February 28, 1997, with the employment period fixed by March 1, 1986.

B. On October 18, 1996, the Plaintiff decided to exclude the Intervenor whose term of appointment expires on February 28, 1997 at the Teachers’ Personnel Committee held on October 18, 1996. On November 18, 1996, the Plaintiff notified the Intervenor that his term of appointment expires on February 28, 1997.

B. (1) On April 2, 2003, the intervenor filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff on April 2, 2003 to confirm the status of professor. On May 25, 2005, the Daegu District Court rendered a judgment dismissing the intervenor's claim (2003Gahap5348).

Luxembourg Intervenor appealed against this, and changed the purport of the claim to the appellate court to the nullification of the decision rejecting the reappointment and the claim for damages. On May 25, 2007, the Daegu High Court rendered a judgment dismissing the claim for nullification of the decision rejecting the reappointment (2005Na3879).

In the Supreme Court on July 29, 2010, the Supreme Court confirmed the invalidity of the decision to refuse reappointment, and sentenced the Supreme Court on February 27, 2003 (2007Da42433) that reversed and remanded the claim for damages after February 27, 2003.

On November 25, 2011, the Daegu High Court rendered a ruling that the Plaintiff shall pay to the Intervenor an amount equivalent to KRW 446,151,125 and its delay damages, and the amount equivalent to KRW 4,648,790 each month from March 1, 2011 until the procedure for review of reappointment is implemented with respect to the Intervenor (201Na6223). The Plaintiff appealed on this, but the Supreme Court dismissed it on May 24, 2012 (201Da11879).

C. The Plaintiff’s teachers’ personnel committee, (i) decided on June 12, 2012, to implement the procedures for review of reappointment against the Intervenor. On July 11, 2012, upon notifying the Intervenor of the commencement of review of reappointment, the Plaintiff’s appointment of the Intervenor during the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2012.