A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2013, at around 09:35, the Defendant driven a B-H motor vehicle at a section of about 50 meters from the G-Woo apartment parking lot located in the B-Woo-gun of Chungcheongnam-do to the entrance in front of the said Hanjin apartment through a op range range from the Hanjin apartment parking lot located in the B-Woo-gun of Chungcheongnam-gun of Chungcheongnam-do to the above Hanjin apartment with the alcohol level of 0.286%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the brewing driver’s statement;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The following circumstances are taken into consideration: (a) the offender committed the instant crime again even though he had a previous record of driving under the influence of alcohol once; (b) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is very high; (c) the risk of drunk driving and the purpose of the revision of the Road Traffic Act intended to strengthen the punishment for drunk driving: The Defendant reflects the crime; (d) the Defendant has no previous record other than a fine once; and (e) the Defendant has no other criminal record other than the Defendant’s age, character, character,