A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a Bppon-off car quantity.

On October 9, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license of a motor vehicle on October 20:25, 2013, driven the said motor vehicle at a section of about 2 km from a Pung cafeteria located in the birth gate in the front of the 119 Safety Center located in the same Ri, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.106%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement of the status of the driver;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The defendant again commits the instant crime even if he/she had a previous record of the same kind of crime, the risk of drunk driving and unlicensed driving, and the circumstances favorable to the purpose of the revision of the Road Traffic Act to strengthen punishment for drunk driving: considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, home environment, etc., and other circumstances, which reflect the defendant's crime, and are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records;