All appeals by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized a mistake by the defense counsel; (b) the Defendant cooperates in the procedure of divorce as desired by the victim C; (c) expressed his/her intent that the said victim would not want the punishment by promising to give up parental authority and custody rights; and (d) there is no history of criminal punishment exceeding a fine; and (c) there is no history of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, the lower court’s sentence imposing orders to complete child abuse treatment programs is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the fact that the crime of this case committed by the prosecutor was committed habitually by assaulting his child and wife, and that it is not good that the victim C expressed his intention that he would not want the punishment of the defendant, but in case of domestic violence, the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant due to economic problems, so it cannot be readily concluded that the defendant was romaticly against the truth, and that the risk of recidivism is high, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. 판단 이 사건 범행은 피고인이 자녀인 피해자 D이 시끄럽게 한다는 이유로 안면부를 때려 턱 부위에 피가 나게 하고 소란스럽게 한다는 이유로 머리채를 잡아당기면서 손바닥으로 안면부를 때려 코피가 나게 하고 입술이 찢어지게 하고 어린이집에서 말썽을 부린다는 이유로 플라스틱 장난감 칼을 이용하여 다리 부위를 수십 회 내려쳐 양쪽 다리에 멍이 들게 하는 등 상습으로 상해를 가하여 피해자 D을 학대하고, 아내인 피해자 C의 뺨을 때리고 주먹으로 안면부를 때리고 발로 몸을 밟아 입술이 찢어지게 하고 눈과 골반 부위에 멍이 들게 하는 등 상습으로 피해자 C에게 상해를 가한 것으로 죄질이 좋지 않은 점, 피해자들은 수사과정에서 피고인이...