Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On October 15, 201, from around 14:18 to 14:25 of the same day, the Defendant had difficulty with the business operation of the above store for about seven minutes, including: (a) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the Espanish C store located in Nam-gu Busan, Busan, and had difficulty with the business operation of the above store for about seven minutes, including: (b) the victim D, who is the head of the business operation of the above store, expressed a bath to “this part of Espane, this part of Espane”;

B. On July 3, 2012, around 20:10, around 20:20, around 20:10, customers of the said store were 20 minutes of desire to take out of the said store for the said reasons, thereby obstructing the victim D’s business operation by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the time, at the victim’s paragraph 1(a), made the victim D (the age of 29) talk in the outside of the store, made the victim D’s face part of the above D to teare two times out of the store, head, and made the above D face part of the above D 3 times in drinking, made the victim’s face part on the right side of the above D 28, and made the victim e (the age of 28) flowed down, and caused the victim’s injury on the part of the above E co, such as having the victim e (the age of 28), teared, and teared the alcohol, and suffered an injury in the number of days of treatment.

3. On July 3, 2012, around 20:20, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of order by assaulting the police officer, such as breaking the F’s rank by breaking the F rank, breaking it off, etc., on the street prior to the Nos. 1’s Spanish burial, which was reported and called 112 for the same reason as indicated in paragraph (b).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of a police officer against D, E, or G;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (such as obstruction of performance of official duties, CCTV photographs);

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 136 of the same Act, respectively, concerning the provision applicable to the facts of crime and the choice of punishment.