logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.10.30 2013고단2166
공문서부정행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) operated a two-wheeled automobile with no registered structure change on the front side of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu) on the front side; and (b) was subject to demand to present an identification card by controlling it to C at the Gyeongjin-gu Police Station

The defendant presented the first class ordinary driver's license under the name of the head of the Seoul Police Agency, which is an official document in possession, as if he was the defendant's driver's license.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents.

2. When preparing a written statement on the case of operating a two-wheeled automobile with no registration change in the structure at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant entered “E” in the name column, “D” and “23” in the cell phone column, and entered “D” in the originator’s column, and signed it in the name of D.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a statement in the name of D, which is a private document related to the certification of facts.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), exercised the forged statement to C, as if it were duly formed, with the police officers who knew of the forgery.

4. On June 27, 2013, around 17:32, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a case of operating a registered non-registered two-wheeled automobile in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office for Traffic Investigation; (b) received an investigation as if it were D; and (c) recorded “D” at the end of the protocol of interrogation of suspect; and (d) forged a private signature with a seal.

5. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 4, exercised the signature of forged D, as seen above, to F, as if the signature of forged D was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. Copies of written statements (D), resident registration certificates (D), and copies thereof;

arrow