All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. At around 11:40 on May 2, 2013, Defendant A assaulted the victim B (the 51 years of age) who was fright at the stage of being drunk in the market frame behind the building following Jinju-si, and was frightened by Defendant A, “The frightenmaa has been fright so that the fright frighten has been frighten, and the face part of the victim was fright at one time due to the right drinking, and the victim’s frighten part was frighten on several occasions.

B. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place as the above paragraph (a) above, assaulted the victim by breathing the victim’s breath with the breath’s breath, by pushing the victim’s breath, cutting down the breath floor, etc.

2. Each of the facts charged of violence is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the victim and the defendants expressed their intent not to be punished for each other after the prosecution of this case. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.