logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.05.29 2018고단23
폭행
Text

All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

Reasons

Public Prosecutor's Office

1. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was a person working as a C bus engineer; (b) was working on the front side of Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si; (c) was making a stop on August 19:30, 2017; and (d) was fluored on the part of the victim A (26 years old, South) who was trying to take passengers on the said vehicle; and (d) was fluored on the part of the victim A (hereinafter referred to as “the victim”), who was fluored to have a large bluorl fluorl in the said vehicle; and (e) was fluording the victim’s body with a bitbluor and the right arms.

2. Defendant A, on the same date, at the same time and at the same place as the above paragraph, committed assault to take the victim’s face from the bus by putting in hand the victim’s breath at a price twice from the victim’s B (29 years old, South) and the dispute with the victim’s face, and drawing in hand.

Judgment

The facts charged in the instant case cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, as a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

Since Defendants, who were victims of each other, withdrawn their wish to punish each other after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow