(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.15 2018구단17174

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.15 2018구단17174

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on February 20, 2016, with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of India (hereinafter “ India”).

B. On March 18, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on May 10, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On June 7, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on June 12, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a Tol, who was residing in the Republic of India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea.

The plaintiff was engaged in volunteer activities to divide food to the injured after the completion of towing, while attending a sexual party, and was threatened with the unfolded singking.

In addition, there is also a misunderstanding that the plaintiff made it possible for the plaintiff to see other hinges as a character.

The plaintiff moved to a drought (Mumbai) in order to avoid the threat from the ebbbs of the high village, and around January 2016, the ebs of the high village was found in the plaintiff's house where the ebs of the high village is drought and returned to the plaintiff's wife.

The plaintiff will return to India as its home country.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2018.10.18 2018구단13998

-서울행정법원 2018.11.29 2018구단20583

-서울행정법원 2019.05.23 2019구단1329

-서울행정법원 2019.05.30 2019구단1787

-서울행정법원 2019.03.21 2018구단76593