1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 22, 2016, as a foreigner of the Republic of Kazkhstan (hereinafter “Kazkhstan”)’s nationality, with the status of stay B-1 (Visa exemption) of the Republic of Kazkhstan.

B. On September 28, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on October 12, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges with sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On October 20, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on September 3, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was originally a newborn baby, and not only engaged in a matrimonial engagement with Islamic male-gu and living together, but also engaged in a religious sasi as Islamic, around May 2016.

After that, the plaintiff began to be threatened with a threat from the friendship of the native village, which is the newborn baby, and they committed assault against the plaintiff's male magu, and the plaintiff demanded that the male magus be hedging with the plaintiff, and made intimidation.

If the plaintiff returns to the Kazakh, one of its home countries, it is still likely to be threatened from the friendships of the Modern Modern Modern High Village.

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. Determination 1: Refugee Act.