A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Water Quality Conservation Act in the Dong branch of the Seoul District Court, and on November 9, 2000, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for the same crime, and sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for a violation of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act at the Seoul East District Court on October 2, 2008, and sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1 year for a violation of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act. On May 1, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 7 million won for the same crime at the same court on May 1, 2009, and on November 8, 2011, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of

From the end of December 2013, the Defendant installed and operated wastewater discharge facilities and preventive facilities in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name “D” in Seoul.

No business operator or any person who operates prevention facilities shall discharge water pollutants in excess of the permissible discharge levels by failing to normally operate discharging facilities and prevention facilities without justifiable grounds.

From January 6, 2014 to April 17, 2014, the Defendant, at least 17 km per day, should be put in a minimum of 17 km, which is a medicine to purify wastewater, in the prevention facilities installed in the foregoing “D,” but at least 10 km per day, thereby discharging inappropriate wastewater. From April 18, 2014 to April 28, 2014, the Defendant discharged wastewater to a level that the chemical oxygen demand (BOD) 579 g/L (Permissible emission standards 120 g/L), the chemical oxygen demand (COD) 308 g/L (130 g/L), 300 g/ 7,320 Do320 (Permissible emission standards).

Accordingly, the Defendant discharged water pollutants exceeding the permissible discharge standards because the Defendant did not normally operate the discharge facilities and prevention facilities without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The investigation report (the report).