1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for one year, Defendant B and C for six months, and Defendant E for a fine of KRW 16.4 million.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Co., Ltd. E (hereinafter “E”) is a company that performs the entrusted business of industrial wastewater in Busan K, and Defendant A is its representative director, Defendant B is a director who exercises overall control over the business of treating wastewater and wastewater facilities, and Defendant C is a director in charge of the wastewater treatment business.

Defendant

F is a person who operates the "M" of oil sales intermediary in Busan L.

1. Defendants A and C in violation of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act agreed to reduce the operating fuel cost, etc., which accounts for the highest portion of the wastewater treatment costs, by treating the toxic wastewater entrusted by a gold company, etc. in Busan area, while treating the toxic wastewater in an abnormal manner without operating a waste treatment facility, which is the main treatment facility.

Accordingly, Defendant A prepared a daily site for the operation of wastewater discharge facilities as if he operated normally in preparation for the inspection and control of related agencies, and attached oil purchase data, etc. in response thereto. Defendant C conspired to discharge improper wastewater without operating the wastewater discharge concentration facilities according to the direction of Defendant A.

Accordingly, Defendant C treated the entrusted wastewater at E’s workplace around 00:20 on March 2, 201, while 201, Defendant C discharged wastewater through the final outlet containing water-quality pollutants (3.6mg/liter, which is 2mg/liter’s discharge standard, 14.836mg/liter’s discharge standard 5mg/liter’s discharge standard, 14.836mg/liter’s discharge standard, 13.96mg/liter’s discharge standard of 10m/liter’s discharge standard of 10m/liter’s discharge standard of 60m/liter’s discharge standard of 79.543mg/liter’s discharge standard of 60m/liter’s discharge standard of 1.32mg/liter’s discharge standard of 60m/liter’s discharge.

(hereinafter “instant discharge”). Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to operate prevention facilities normally without justifiable grounds, thereby exceeding the permissible discharge level.