1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

(a) The status F of the Party is a person who received treatment, as seen subsequent to the G Hospital, and Defendant D is a doctor in charge of F as a doctor of G Hospital, and Defendant E is the head of G Hospital as an employer of Defendant D;

B. Before the diagnosis of pulmonary cancer, F was treated at G Hospital on February 23, 2008; F was diagnosed at F’s G hospital’s spacopic copic urology (her was diagnosed at around 20 years before being diagnosed at around 10 years, and diagnosed as a spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopics; F was diagnosed at around five years before being diagnosed; F was treated as a spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic spacopic scopic scopic s

(Sule CT test reading opinion: (3) Afterwards, F took a chest simple radiation photographing and chest CT photographing at G Hospital from September 9, 2009 to June 2010, respectively, as follows: (a) from September 9, 2009 to June 2010:

(A) A) - After the examination of Sep. 9, 2009, a chest pulmonary tuberculosis therapy is judged to be active pulmonary pulmonary tuberculosis, and there is no special change: (b) on Oct. 7, 2009 and Nov. 11 of the same year - There is no special change in the chest plesive radiation photograph photographs - From Nov. 27, 2009 to Dec. 2 of the same year, 2009 - a chest chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronological chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic chronic - From 10 to July 18.