1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim even if the submitted evidence is reviewed together with the plaintiff's assertion, is justified.

Therefore, the reasons for the statement concerning this case are as follows: (a) the court added “the result of chest simple radiation reading” in the front of the “ pneumoconiosis” in Section 2 of the first instance judgment; (b) the “this court” in Section 9 as the “first instance court”; and (c) the “no evidence exists to deem that there was a combination of pneumoconiosis with other active pulmonary tuberculosis” in Articles 12 and 13 as the “the first instance court”; and (d) the reasoning for the first instance judgment is as follows: (a) the opinion suggesting that there was no evidence to deem that there was a combination of pneumoconiosis with other active pulmonary tuberculosis; and (b) therefore, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2)

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.