logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.24 2018나51814
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this court’s explanation are the same as the written judgment of the court of first instance, except for the submission or addition of the following paragraphs 2, and thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

(a)on the 7th sentence of the first instance court, the “police authority” in the 10th sentence is regarded as “police officer”;

B. Part 8 of the first instance court's decision "as there was a person accompanying the plaintiff" is deemed to be "as there was a number of persons, not a person married, but a number of persons about to go together."

(c) conduct 8 and Nos. 9 of the first instance court ruling, provided that “However,” is added to “the following circumstances, i.e., the whole purport of the arguments, which may be recognized by considering the above basic facts and the entire purport of the arguments as a whole,” respectively.

Part 16 of the Decision of the first instance shall add to the following:

“The Defendant also argued that Plaintiff D was not the one person’s own demonstration but the other person’s demonstration was taken, and thus, it did not infringe on the freedom of expression. However, Plaintiff D’s right to freedom of action was infringed upon by the passage of Plaintiff D to the fountain. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.”

(e) Appendix 10, 19 of the first instance judgment, “The time and time of one person’s demonstration scheduled at the beginning,” added “in the case of the Plaintiff D, it was intended to photograph another person’s one person’s demonstration without one person’s own demonstration.”

(f) Part 11 of the first instance judgment “the date of pronouncement of this judgment” shall be deemed to read “the date of pronouncement of the first instance judgment”;

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims shall be accepted within the scope of each of the above recognitions, and each of the remaining claims shall be dismissed as there is no ground. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified and it is so ordered that all of the appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

arrow