1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following additional payments are the amount to be paid with respect to the principal action:

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition, “the instant case” is added in front of “ship” under Section 2 of the first instance court’s decision No. 4.

On the 4th sentence of the first instance judgment, the term “panpanty” is added in the front of the 6th sentence’s regular container line.

On the 5th page of the judgment of the first instance court, the "in the front side" in the 4th sentence is called "in the panty court."

On the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the 6th judgment of the first instance gives and receives “e-mail, etc.” shall be changed to “e-mail, etc.”.

On the 8th judgment of the first instance court, “the result of fact inquiry” in the 9th judgment is added to “the result of fact inquiry” and “the result of fact inquiry on July 22, 2014.”

On the 10th of the first instance judgment, the first instance court's notice "as to be known" is deemed to be "as to be known".

On December 10, 2012, the first instance court’s decision No. 10 stated the phrase “as it is around October 10, 2013,” as “as at December 10, 2012,” the Plaintiff’s first request from G to transport the instant cargo, the freight rate, etc. was not agreed upon between ttex and Etex even until the instant cargo is loaded (the result of inquiry as at July 22, 2014, for Ttex).”

Part 3 of the Decision of the first instance court No. 15 (3) of the Decision No. 15 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not exceed the "specific costs to be borne by the defendant".

(3) According to the facts acknowledged earlier, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the attached Form “Expenses Calculation Table,” barring any special circumstance.

However, the plaintiff asserts that "the plaintiff's corporate profit 3,447,469 won" in [Attachment 16] No. 16 should be borne by the defendant, but the plaintiff and the defendant should be borne by the defendant.