logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2014.04.08 2014고정23
명예훼손
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The slaughter of livestock shall be conducted at a place of work permitted by a Mayor/Do Governor.

Defendant

B On January 20, 2013, after flying a vegetable seed owned by Gangnam-si E, the said vegetable container was slaughtered at a vegetable base, but the said vegetableter was not at the place of work permitted by the Mayor/Do Governor with respect to the slaughter of livestock.

Accordingly, the above Defendant slaughtered livestock at a place other than a place of work permitted by the Mayor/Do Governor with respect to the slaughter of livestock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B by the prosecution;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Articles 45 (1) 1 and 7 (1) of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act for facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Defendant B, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, has no record of crime except that sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,00 for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act around 1991. The Defendant’s economic condition, and the economic condition of the above Defendant’s above Defendant’s above Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, background of the crime, means and consequence, and all the other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records and arguments, including the circumstances before and after the crime.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. On January 7, 2013, the summary of the facts charged, Defendant A, at H station located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si around 10:00, damaged the reputation of the victims by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out false facts, by the victim K, who is the director of the said H station, i.e., the president of the said H station, L, the employees of the same H station, M, N, etc., who are the employees of the said H station, and N.O. who are the directors of the said H station.

2. The facts charged against Defendant A constitute Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act.

arrow