logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2014.11.14 2014고단671
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 5, 2014, at around 21:30 on June 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a cargo vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.140% from the 1km section to the galloning road located in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si; (b) around 21:50 on the same day from the roads in front of the Yannam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; and (c) around 21:50 on the same day, the Defendant driven a cargo vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of about

2. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, operated the same gallon vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance as above.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in the operation of a gallon driver vehicle.

On June 5, 2014, at around 21:50, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, driven the said cargo, and driven the two-lane road in front of the oil station located in Gangseo-si C, Gangnam-si, along the direction from the intersection of Gangseo-si to the rooftop 00-distance.

In front of the defendant's running direction, since the GJ car of the victim F (53 years old) driving was a traffic signal atmosphere, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front left and the steering system as a driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so while under the influence of alcohol and proceeded as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s driving in the front part of the vehicle above the Defendant’s driving, received the part concerning the back part of the vehicle above the victim’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt and tension, which requires treatment for about two weeks due to such occupational negligence, and at the same time destroyed the Defendant’s 869,533 won in total, such as the exchange of panions by using the above Bata car owned by the victim.

arrow