logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.11.30 2018고정444
소방시설공사업법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is the representative director of the Plaintiff Company B (hereinafter “B”) located in Ansan-gu G in Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu.

Defendant

A without registering fire-fighting system business, from March 6, 2017 to March 30, 2017, performed the work of installing a fire-fighting pipeline in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City and J apartment fire-fighting pipe (inward pipes, indoor fire hydrant pipes, and thermal re-construction).

2. Defendant B committed the act of violation as described in paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant B’s duties at the date, time, and place of paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some statements of each reference witness;

1. An investigation report (issuance of a certified copy of corporate registry);

1. Cases of modification of works to supplement fire-fighting pipes;

1. Supervision opinion;

1. Report on commencing fire-fighting system installation;

1. A plan for supervising fire-fighting works;

1. The work day report;

1. Contract for work;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. A copy of the civil petition;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes attached thereto;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 39, 35, and 4 (1) of the Act on the Construction Business of Fire-Fighting Systems (excluding punishment)

(b) Defendant B: Articles 39, 35, and 4(1) of the Act on the Construction Business of Fire-Fighting Systems;

1. Defendant A to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act in the provisional payment order

1. As to the summary of the assertion I and J apartment fire pipeline construction (hereinafter “instant fire pipeline construction”), Defendant B only supplied simple labor manpower at the construction site, and the simple labor manpower was constructed under the direction and supervision of L, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”), and without registering the fire-fighting system business, the Defendants performed the instant fire pipeline construction without registering the fire-fighting system business.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

1) The representative meeting of I and J apartment occupants shall be January 6, 2017.

arrow