Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of B Co., Ltd. in 1,00, and Defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation with the purpose of professional fire fighting construction work A.

1. When he/she installs a fire-fighting system pipeline or obtains a certificate of completion of a fire-fighting system from the time of reclamation to the time he/she installs such pipeline for supervising fire-fighting system installation, and in cases of a fire-fighting construction site exceeding a certain size, he/she shall place a supervisor permanently;

Nevertheless, the defendant did not have F, a supervisor under his control, who is a supervisor under his supervision while conducting fire-fighting system supervision at the E-Newly constructed apartment site in the size of 17,00 p.m. D and 17, a private person who is required to stay at the site.

The defendant did not assign a supervisor to a fire-fighting system installation site.

2. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant Company, committed a violation as prescribed in paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 37 Subparag. 2 and Article 18(1) of the Fire-Fighting Facility Business Act, and selection of fines;

(b) Defendant B corporation: Articles 39, 37 subparag. 2, and 18(1) of the Act on the Construction Business of Fire-Fighting Systems

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act