1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with B and C (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).

Defendant Amere Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is the Plaintiff Company and the Defendant A is the Plaintiff.

B. On September 4, 2015, B purchased a new lane on the Plaintiff’s vehicle. B prior to the delivery of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, the sales company of the Plaintiff’s vehicle requested the Defendant Company to purchase the exhaustion manufactured by the Defendant Company and install the exhaustion in the form of reclamation.

(c) For this purpose, Defendant A first means a partition wall under which the interior and engine room of the vehicle is isolated on the front side of the front side of the Plaintiff vehicle on the front side.

Alternatively, a meter board, a driver, a audio and air condition control board, etc. are installed.

The term “vehicle audio equipment” means a measure to remove vehicles installed in the vehicle, install internal studs, cut off strings of the end of the electric wires connected in the internal studs (hereinafter “instant electric wires”) and connect the front line of the electric wires connected from the Plaintiff’s vehicle with the end of the electric wires, and prevent the said connecting section from leakage of the smoke-processing electric power by using the smoke tape or handculator.

d. The installation was completed.

B around October 24, 2015, around 14:25, around 14:25, in order to turn on the trial operation of the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked in the “Ecafeteria” parking lot front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, the vehicle key began to have been extended by an emergency pressing installed on the lurgy in the lurgy.

The smoke led to the fire, and the inside of the plaintiff's vehicle around the e-cafeteria was completely burned, the glass of the plaintiff's vehicle was broken, and the part of the E-cafeteria building was destroyed.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). E.

As a result of the fire reduction in Seoul, the engine inside the Plaintiff’s vehicle was clean and connect the Plaintiff’s vehicle with the fireproof and the Plaintiff’s vehicle.