logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.04.27 2015가단7239
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 32,000,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s counterclaim from January 9, 2013 to April 27, 2016.

Reasons

(2) The construction period warranty period of construction to extend the number of equipment by improving the water quality of underwater water used for the installation of underwater water purification facilities in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (U.S. 4 November 4, 201): 20 years after completion of construction * 49,500,000 (existence of different opinions between the plaintiff and the defendant) for the purpose of improving the sales performance of G Co., Ltd. (N representative N. ; hereinafter referred to as “G”) in which the Defendant representative L, who is the land owner, actually operating within 30 days after completion of construction / [20 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [20 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [20 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [20 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [30 days after completion of construction / [200 days after completion of construction / [1000 days after completion of construction / [200 days after completion of construction / [300000 days

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract for construction works as follows:

Details of the issuance of the tax invoice for the name of construction project (units: 119,90,000 on November 30, 201; 119,90,900 on 119,90,900,000 G intermediate payment of 86,900,000 on December 5, 2011; 106,70,000,0313,500,000 G E design cost for the E E design project on March 26, 2012;

arrow