beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,242,00 and its annual amount from September 3, 2013 to September 25, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company running the business of manufacturing electrical control devices and automated machinery, and the Defendant is a company running the business of manufacturing painting machinery and equipment.
B. On January 30, 2013 and February 14, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of facilities”) with the owner of the automobile parts manufacturing business, under which the Defendant would supply the owner of the vehicle plastic parts with the equipment automatically sealed.
Items : 30% of the advance payment on the terms and conditions of 2 billion won (excluding surtax) for the payment of the CONEYPAT contract signed on February 14, 2013 on the goods supply contract signed on February 14, 2013, and 40% of the remainder 30% of the intermediate payment 40% of the remainder 30% of the remainder 30% of the remainder 40% of the remainder 40% of the remainder 40% of the remainder 40% of the remainder 40% of the payment period from April 16, 2013 to April 23, 2013 to April 23, 2014 to April 23, 2013 to April 23, 2014.
The duties of supplying painting facilities under the instant facility supply contract are carried out at the following levels:
A/S in the quantity of production of prototypes, which is approved by the ordering office for the design of painting facilities, installation of electric painting facilities, installation of electrical equipment (short, linked)
D. On February 8, 2013, the Plaintiff calculated the construction cost as KRW 200,034,745 (Additional No. 7) with respect to the “YINTINGPLT construction” as a part of the instant contract for the supply of facilities, and submitted a quotation (Evidence No. 7) to the Defendant.
E. On February 21, 2013, after reviewing the said quotation submitted by the Plaintiff, the Defendant prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff a written order (Evidence 2) stating that “G Geum River (U.S. main factory) construction works for PAING LINE are ordered to work cost of KRW 165,00,000 (Additional Tax),” and on March 4, 2013, the Defendant ordered “G Geum River PAING PAINE additional construction works” to work cost of KRW 2,40,000 (Additional Tax).