A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On February 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for the crime of interference with business at the Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on May 4, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant, from around 14:00 on August 11, 2017 to around 14:10 on the same day, went through alcohol to the technical point of “carf D” in the name of the victim C (n, 42 years of age), which was operated by the Gangnam-gun Party B, and changed the alcohol. However, the Defendant, as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes, she obstructed the victim’s service by force for about 10 minutes, such as: (a) many unspecified customers, who find a coffee specialty, from around 14:0 to July 23, 2018, by having the victim not sell alcohol to the coffee specialty; and (b) having many and unspecified customers, who find a coffee specialty, not enter the coffee specialty, and interfere with the victim’s service of coffee specialty, restaurant, convenience store, and business by force over nine minutes in total, as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, G, H, C, and I;

1. Investigative report-2. Confirmation of the suspect's assault, attachment to the 112 Reporting prior to the processing of the 112 Reporting, investigation report (related to the investigation of the suspect), investigation report (Attachment to CCTV images that interfere with the business of convenience points);

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal investigation reports (verification of the fact that a suspect is released from a repeated crime);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act indicate that the Defendant recognized and reflected each of the instant crimes. The fact that people at the scene of the Defendant’s act feel uneasy or have not caused material damage beyond the degree of interference with the operations of the victims, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.