logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 04. 24. 선고 2018누33373 판결
조합에 대한 자산의 현물출자는 자산의 유상이전으로서 양도소득세의 과세원인인 양도에 해당[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Incheon District Court 2016Gudan367 ( October 2018), Incheon District Court 2016Gudan367

Title

Investment in kind of assets in a partnership shall be the commercial transfer of assets, which is the cause of taxation of the capital gains tax.

Summary

The investment in kind of assets to a union constitutes the transfer which is a taxable cause of capital gains tax as the onerous transfer of assets, and the time of such transfer is the time of the investment in kind to the union, and the time of acquisition and acquisition by the natives directly supplied with the land for living countermeasures shall not be deemed the same as the time of acquisition and acquisition by the plaintiffs who take over

Related statutes

Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

Seoul High Court 2018Nu3373 Disposition Revocation of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

Ma 0 Jeju

Defendant, Appellant

000 director of the tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Incheon District Court Decision 2016Gudan367 Decided January 9, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 27, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

April 24, 2018

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The transfer income tax reverted to the plaintiff of May 1, 2015 by the defendant against the plaintiff of May 1, 2015

20,558,866 won shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's reasoning for this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation

Article 8 (2) of the Court Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow