logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 28. 선고 2016다234425 판결
(심리불속행)체납자가 부동산을 매도하면서 매수인을 통하여 허위의 근저당권자에게 금원을 송금하게 한 것은 증여행위로서 사해행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court (former High Court) 2015Na100285 (Law No. 16, 2016)

Title

It constitutes a fraudulent act as a gift to have a delinquent taxpayer transfer money to a false mortgagee via a purchaser while selling real estate.

Summary

(1) In the event that a delinquent taxpayer sells real estate, he/she remitted KRW 100 million to the Defendant’s deposit account through a purchaser of real estate, which constitutes a fraudulent act, since he/she knowingly donated the above money to the Defendant by pretending to repay to the Plaintiff, who is a tax claim.

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Code / [Right of Revocation]

Cases

Supreme Court-2016-C-234425 ( September 28, 2016)

Plaintiff-Appellee

Korea

Defendant-Appellant

Kim AA et al.

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court-2015-Na-100285 ( October 16, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

2016.28

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Trial Procedure.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

It is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow