logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.04.05 2015가단114881
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 65,536,00 with full payment from July 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a person who runs the food processing business of clothing, and the defendant is a corporation that runs the food wholesale business.

B. On October 18, 2014, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to produce sugars and sugars for female use. On October 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 31,000 won per sheet for male use, and (b) 800 copies for female use; and (c) drafted a basic contract for forest treatment as of October 30, 2014 for the delivery date.

C. On October 30, 2014, the Plaintiff completed 1,856 of the 2,300 copies under the contract entered into with the Defendant, but it was confirmed that the water control of the 1,856 parts of the 2,300 parts under the contract was less than the normal standards the Defendant wants.

On November 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) removed normal labels attached to the rear part of the title and the inside of the clothes of the clothing to export the said quantities to China; (b) requested the Defendant to attach a new label in which the size as requested by the Defendant was written (hereinafter “the primary revision work”); (c) upon the Plaintiff’s demand for the payment of the contractual processing costs, the Defendant paid KRW 25,000,000 out of the contractual processing costs; (d) the Plaintiff completed the primary revision work around December 20, 2014; and (e) from November 20, 2014 to January 20, 2015, the Defendant provided the Defendant with 152 copies of the product as samples at nine times from November 20, 2014 to January 20, 2015; and (e) the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to pay all parts of the product to the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s replacement of 150,000 parts of the product as its own.

G. As from January 27, 2015, the Plaintiff is performing the secondary revision work.

2. Until July, 200, 218 copies of products were provided to the Defendant by sampling up to nine times, and 1,548 copies remaining on March 2, 2015 after completing the secondary revision work.

arrow