logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 밀양지원 2014.05.22 2014고정21
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of (State) D in C when the defendant is close.

The Defendant and E entered into a lease agreement with F on September 28, 201, and the auction of the above factory building was conducted on the leased and used by the said Section D. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant and E were obliged to deliver the above factory building to H, and the Defendant and E continued possession of the above factory building to I, an agent of the victim, even though they were obligated to deliver the above factory building to the said Section D., as the Defendant and E continued to occupy the above factory building.

1. At around 11:30 on August 25, 2012, the Defendant and E: (a) sought a new construction project for the relocation of the above (e.g., victim G, etc.; (b) seven employees of the said (e.g., the said) H to prevent the victim from entering the said factory building; (c) Defendant A was seated in the front wheel chairs to prevent the victim from entering the said factory building; and (d) Defendant A was seated in the front wheel so as to have the victim h to walk up; and (e) E was able to take a walk with the victim.

As a result, the defendant and E conspiredd with each other to interfere with the victim's relocation work.

2. Around 10:00 on September 7, 2012, the Defendant and E obstructed the victim’s relocation work in the manner described in paragraph (1) in order to sell at least 19 points of the successful machine at the location described in paragraph (1), including the victim G, and 4 persons related to the said state, including the victim G, and 5 persons on the mechanical sales.

3. From September 13, 2012 to October 30, 2012, the Defendant and E interfered with the victim’s (ju) relocation by force by blocking all of the security facilities installed to prevent theft against the above factory buildings and machinery, and blocking the victim’s (ju) relocation by force by blocking all of the security facilities installed to prevent theft of the above factory buildings and machinery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each Party to E and J.

arrow