logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.05.23 2012고단1250
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an outside director of F, a corporation with a certain share on the access road to Pyeongtaek-si E factory, and the victim G is a person in charge of the J's site construction work (I site) after being awarded a contract for the extension of a factory site from H(H).

1. The Defendant and K agreed to prevent the victim’s ready-mixed vehicle from entering the extended construction site and performing construction work on the access road of the said extended construction site (I site) on the ground that the victim’s victim G had a share in the land of the said extended construction site (I site) in order to carry out the above construction work. From 09:00 on June 8, 2012, K parked on the access road to Pyeongtaek-si Factory from around 09:00 to about the access road to Pyeongtaek-si, in the direction of street on the access road. The Defendant parked the MY vehicle owned by the Defendant in the direction of street from around 10:20 on the same day and parked the vehicle in the direction of street on the access road at the same place from around 10:20 on the same day, and prevented the operation of the vehicle from being carried on front of the said ready-mixed vehicle, thereby hindering the victim’s factory extension work by force.

2. The Defendant and two service providers employed by the Defendant and the Defendant enter the construction site for the extension of the factory; for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph, the victim’s ready-mixed vehicle that is operated by the Defendant and the Defendant enter the construction site for the extension of the factory; and for the same reason, the victim’s ready-mixed vehicle does not enter the construction site for the extension of the factory site; and the two employees from June 14, 2012 to 14:50, two employees interfered with the extension of the victim’s construction work by obstructing the entry of the Oli-mixed vehicle operated by the victim company at the entrance of the extension construction site at the entrance of the extension construction site under the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness P and K;

1. Statement made by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to K; and

arrow