logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2020.01.06 2019고단1014
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of three million won and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Violence B(n, 32 years old) with the Defendant and the Victim C (Nam, 26 years old) are as follows. B and the Victim C (Nam, 26 years old) are as follows: (a) with the knowledge of peace.

Around 00:30 on August 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) called “Damburon” in front of the Damburon city; (b) Inasmuch as the victim was forced to drive from B and had been in the same place, the Defendant used the victim’s clothes at one time due to a sound “finite feb” regardless of whether the police officers dispatched after receiving the 112 report and called “finite feb”.

B. When the Defendant was arrested in the act of committing a crime on the grounds of the same paragraph as the above paragraph 1, from the assistant F belonging to the E District Unit of the Innju Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving 112 reports at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, the Defendant abused F with her head upon taking a bath to the above F, and assaulted F with her head on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning handling of the case, such as prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

2. Defendant B, at the same date and time as the above paragraph (a) above, and at a place, the Defendant sent a slope F, and a slope G, who was absent from the patrol vehicle by arresting A in the act of committing an offense as set forth in the above 1.B, sent a back door of the patrol vehicle and assaulted the parts of the arms and legs of the said G, which were seated on the back seat of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning handling of the case, such as prevention and suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of the sentence against the crime A: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow