(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가단5101333

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가단5101333

구상금

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu and E Ground Borrowing (hereinafter “instant Borrowing”). G was in charge of maintenance and management of the instant Borrowing, including the receipt of rent, the cleaning of common areas, the separate collection of waste, the payment of public charges, etc., and Defendant B and C are licensed real estate agents.

The Defendant Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) established a mutual aid agreement with Defendant B, C, and the amount of mutual aid as KRW 100 million, and concluded a mutual aid agreement with Defendant B, and C, which provides that the Defendant Association shall provide compensation within the limit of the amount of mutual aid coverage (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”) within the scope of the amount of mutual aid coverage, in the event that Defendant B and C caused property damage to the parties

B. (1) On January 12, 2009, H concluded a lease agreement with G, who is called the Plaintiff’s agent, with regard to subparagraph 202 of the loan of this case, by setting the lease deposit of KRW 53 million and February 27, 2012, and paid KRW 53 million to G.

In the above lease contract, the defendant C and B are written as the broker.

(2) Around October 2004, G referred to as the Plaintiff’s agent and the instant loan No. 203, B entered into a lease agreement with a deposit of KRW 30 million and paid KRW 30 million to G.

I, on June 9, 2010, called G as the Plaintiff’s agent, and the loan 203 Dong-dong 203, concluded a lease contract with the term of June 8, 201, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 35 million and the term of lease, and paid KRW 5 million increased to G.

On June 9, 2010, the defendant B stated a licensed real estate agent's lease agreement as a broker.

C. As a result of the relevant lawsuit, H and I shall be the Seoul Central District Court against the Plaintiff, J, G, Defendant C, and others.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2014가단5087215

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.20 2014가단5019601

-서울고등법원 2019.01.09 2017나2015360

-인천지방법원 2017.01.10 2016가합50029

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.15 2013가단5073141