The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000 (per million), and if the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000 (per million).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On May 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent KRW 30,000 from the Defendant’s Gwangju Bank Account (E), around 23:17, 205, to 30,000, the Defendant, who was visited and searched Rober’s “C” camera, an Internet site; and (b) sent KRW 30,000,000 to pentt Doctrine and Doctrine, a local mental medicine medicine, to 9 Doctrine and Doctrine; and (c) around June 23:17, 2015, the Defendant sent KRW 30,000 from the Defendant’s Gwangju Bank Account (E) to pentt Doctrine and Docdi.

around 13:00 on August 18, 2015, the Defendant received and purchased a house-to-door, 9 YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YYY YY YYY YYY YYYY YYY YYY YYY

2. Around 13:00 on September 19, 2015, the Defendant administered the pentart in a way that the Defendant spawns together with water in the Nam-gu Gwangju metropolitan area with water.

As a result, the Defendant purchased pentitry and d, a local mental medicine, and administered pentitty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the suspect of the police, or each suspect of the D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Requests for appraisal, response to requests for appraisal, and application of the Act and subordinate statutes on assessment and report;

1. Article 61 (1) 5, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (d) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. is that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and his depth is divided.

This case is a case where the defendant purchased drugs sold in the market for the purpose of multi-locks on the Internet and takes them into account the circumstances, and the defendant is the first offender who has no criminal record.

In addition, it is decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances regarding sentencing.