logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2016.08.26 2015고정90
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant withdrawn from C’s office from December 1983 to September 2006 as a pastor at C’s general assembly. From around 1999 to February 2002, the Defendant served as a pastor at C’s general assembly D church (Gu E church).

After withdrawal from C as above, the Defendant demanded the return of the land that he had increased while he was in office as a pastor to C, but did not accept it.

On November 13, 2013, the Defendant embezzled because F (C founder) did not return his/her land to the public office branch office of the Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office, even though the F (C founder) returned his/her land, and G (D church's present pastor) harvested and stolen the sense from the trees planted on his/her land.

On February 10, 2014, an appeal was filed against a non-prosecution disposition, and the appeal was dismissed on March 18, 2014, but the appeal was filed with the Daejeon High Public Prosecutor's Office. On March 18, 2014, the appeal was filed with the Daejeon High Court for adjudication (No. 2014 first 199).

The Defendant, as evidence in the above case of G’s application for adjudication, submitted as evidence documents the “written resolution of the church for the reason of donation registration” in the name of the church, “written resolution of the church for the change of land category for the change of division registration,” and “full-time charter contract,” prepared by having the Defendant as his agent or present at the time of having held office in the D church. In order to occupy a favorable position in the dispute with D church, the above documents were authentic and the above facts were prepared in order to point out the favorable position in the dispute with D church, and even with the knowledge that G did not forge, G, despite being aware of the fact that he did not forge, intended to file

In accordance with the above plan, the defendant, at the I pastor's house located in He in the Seocho-si National Assembly on December 2014, 201, had I, who is aware of the fact, forgeed the seal of the complainant and forged the seal of the complainant, and decided on April 1, 2001, on March 1, 2002, on the change of the category of conversion of the division of the C church E church at C general assembly on March 1, 202.

arrow