1. Of the instant lawsuit, Defendant H Religious Organizations Jinsa in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu L, January 1, 2015, January 7, 2015, and January 21, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties’ relationship 1) The Gangnam-gu Seoul Northern District N (hereinafter “Defendant church”)

The defendant church located in the defendant church shall be the General Assembly of H religious Organizations (P) (hereinafter referred to as the “General Assembly”).

2) Defendant H Religious Organization I’s I’m Union under its jurisdiction (hereinafter “Defendant Union”).

(2) On April 21, 1993, the plaintiff A received a wooden case from the defendant Labor Union.

Plaintiff

A around October 17, 2005, upon obtaining the approval of the attendance of the defendant's association, has been employed as a delegated pastor of the defendant's association (which concurrently holds the position as a chairman of the party and a member of the church) from around that time.

3) The rest of the plaintiffs are the administrative bodies of the defendant church. (b) The other plaintiffs are the administrative bodies of the defendant church. (a) Each judgment against the plaintiff A of the trial states belonging to the general assembly and the dispute of the defendant church 1) The adjudication state under the general assembly (hereinafter referred to as the "decision state of the general assembly") shall be the administrative bodies of the defendant church with respect to the filing of the lawsuit by Q, which is the internal collector of the defendant church, on August 1, 2011, by which the plaintiff A, who is a U.S. citizen, is the administrative authority of the defendant church, respectively, and the resolution of the general assembly resolution of the 69th general assembly and the 87th general assembly resolution of the 69th general assembly, the resolution that the foreign permanent sovereignty and the citizen rights holder of the foreign citizenship under the general assembly, who belongs to the general assembly, shall be free from the public office, but the foreign citizen rights holder shall not be free from the public office.

“Resolution was adopted.” On the ground of the violation of the foregoing, it is confirmed that the resolution approved by the Defendant’s Labor Association to invite the Plaintiff to the Defendant church delegate pastor (No. 168, Oct. 17, 2005 to Oct. 18, 2005) is invalid.

‘A judgment that has become void of the first Cheong-ice approval resolution' is 'a judgment that has become void'.

A. The Court rendered a ruling.

2. On August 4, 201, after receiving a judgment of nullification of the first decision to approve the ice ice ice ice ice, the defendant association passed a resolution to send R to the temporary president of the above church on the ground that the vacancy occurred in the president of the defendant church.

From this point of time, Plaintiff A.