Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On January 2, 2017, the Defendant driving the said car at around 17:00, and driving it along the two-lanes of the 683-1 Seoul Innovation Co., Ltd., along the two-lanes of the 683-1 Seoul Innovation Co., Ltd., the two-lanes of the 683-1 Seoul Innovation Co., Ltd., and became the intersection in front of the Seoul Innovation Co., Ltd., which is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed. As such, a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, even though the defendant neglected this, he operated a Mad bus due to the negligence of the U.S., and got the victim E (48 years old) (48 years old) who proceeded along a one-lane (only a green-only lane) with the green-only translation from the non-wide area, and did not avoid the defendant's vehicle and did not get the part of the driver's seat in front of the bus.

In the end, the Defendant suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment from the victim E due to such occupational negligence, and was boarding the bus as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including that the Defendant was on board the bus as stated in the list of crimes committed.

18 and one victim who participated in a passenger car of the defendant suffered each injury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of F, E, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, or U;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. The application of eight copies of photographs of on-site and on-site vehicles; and

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims G with the largest criminal situation)

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the opposite direction of the defendant.