Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving a passenger car in B T-gu.

On November 18, 2016, at around 03:05, the Defendant proceeded two lanes of the two lanes in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C at a speed narrow speed from the green translation to the non-wide distance.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation well and safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke while driving the car, and the bus stop system at the center of the bus stop x 2m in front of the left-hand side of the car volume x 4444.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed property equivalent to KRW 3,490,117, such as the replacement of the nes and Advertising Panel, etc., and left the scene without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, even though it caused any danger or impediment to traffic due to non-products, such as the free strike due to the collision, etc. at the time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a traffic accident report (1) (2), report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, photographs of the scene of the accident, photographs of a harming vehicle, and estimates;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes the crime of this case as the defendant, agreed with the victim, and has no record of punishment. However, the degree of damage of this case is not less less than that of the victim, and the purpose of Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act is to prevent traffic danger and obstacle that occur on the road and ensure safe and smooth flow of traffic. Thus, the defendant's act of this case is clear to the above purport.