Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are residents living in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul apartment complex.

around 15:30 on August 9, 2015, Defendants came to be trial expenses on the grounds that Defendant B did not wish Defendant A within the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “G”.

1. Defendant A, at the above date and place, carried water on the face of the victim B (e.g., 74 years of age) for the foregoing reasons, she dumpeded the buck, and she was given preferential leave to the victim for about three weeks when she saw the buckbucks and she was drinking on the face of bucks.

2. When the Defendant met water from the victim A (the age of 60) at the above date, time and place, the Defendant asserted that water from the victim’s face and caused water to be aground to the victim’s face while spraying water into the scarb World Cup, and caused the victim to be faced with water on a single occasion, and used both chest and both arms to assault the victim in both hands, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness A and B;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants (excluding the part of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants B from the 21st to the 10th 10th 2nd 10 of the investigation record “scam receiving water from the scam World”;

1. A medical certificate and submission of reference materials (including a medical certificate of injury attached thereto);

1. Suspect A photograph, suspect B photograph, machine-to-mail photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (suspects' photographs and scarbs' photographs);

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: the Defendants’ choice of fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: the Defendants and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the defense counsel of the Defendants A of self-defense to defend their respective acts against the other party’s attack.