logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.06.14 2018고단486
건설기술진흥법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of six months, Defendant B’s fine of 4,00,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

D Co., Ltd. (F) and G Co., Ltd. (H) are operating as a company substantially operated by H, and is operated as a single company by using the same factory site as the same office site in Gyeongsung-gun I in Gyeongnam-nam, Gyeongnam-gun I, and jointly purchasing and using materials.

Defendant

D Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling J (hereinafter referred to as “J”). Defendant B is the head of the quality control office of the above company. Defendant C is a person who conducts a quality test on aggregate and ready-mixed. Defendant A is the head of the quality control office of the above company and the head of the quality control office of the above company. Defendant A is the vice head of the G Co., Ltd. who is the person in charge of purchasing ready-mixed materials and H's friendship.

1. A manufacturer of ready-mixeds jointly committed by Defendant A, B, and C shall not manufacture ready-mixeds by using de-cleaned sea sand, the content of which exceeds 0.04% of the statutory standard, and the quality of which is not secured.

Defendants: (a) around January 2017, the supply of sand to a fishermen’s demonstration opposing the extraction of sand remaining in the South Sea; (b) the supply of sand is difficult due to the suspension of the supply of water; (c) in collusion with the increase in the quantity of water for construction; (d) Defendant A purchased non-cleaning L (hereinafter “the instant sand”) from K from February 2017 to May 201 of the same year; (e) Defendant C inspected the content of the instant sand in excess of two to three times the statutory standard values; and (e) Defendant C instructed Defendant C to check the content of the instant sand in accordance with the direction of Defendant A and report it to Defendant B; and (e) Defendant B, instructed the Defendant C to “beat by finding out the bottom of the standard values” and to keep the false test report that Defendant C had conducted with the existing inventory from February 2017 to May 2017.

5. Between 30.0 and 30.0, the list of offenses in Annex I at the above factory located in Gyeong-gun, Jinnam-gun I.

arrow