logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.04.29 2014고단3044 (1)
골재채취법위반
Text

1. Defendant D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and by a fine of fifteen thousand won for Defendant E-stock company.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant D and E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”) are corporations established for the purpose of screening sea sand, washing, and selling, and Defendant D is the actual representative director of Defendant E.

A. While Defendant D, at around June 1, 2013, should clean and sell sea sand supplied by aggregate extraction business operators, Defendant D supplied sea sand at a level exceeding 0.04%, which is the legal standard for salt freight concentration, as it failed to clean the sea sand properly, to supply 0.06% sea sand to C, and from February 15, 2013 to August 27, 2014, as indicated in the remaining order except the No. 115 in the annexed list of crimes (1) from February 15, 2013 to August 27, 2014, Defendant D supplied sea sand over 115 times in total.

B. Defendant E Co., Ltd. committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph.

2. Defendant F and Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant G”) are corporations established for the purpose of screening sea sand, washing and selling, and Defendant F is the representative director of G.

A. Although Defendant F, at around March 24, 2014, should clean and sell sea sand supplied by the aggregate extraction business entity around March 24, 2014, Defendant F supplied sea sand in a state exceeding 0.04% of the statutory standard for salt freight concentration by failing to clean off the sea sand properly and supplying sea sand to AP Busan at a level exceeding 0.065%, and from March 18, 2014 to September 25, 2014, Defendant F supplied sea sand in a state exceeding 0.04% of the statutory standard for salt freight concentration over 18 times in total, such as the remaining sequences except 1, 3, and 18.

B. Defendant G is the same date, time, and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and the above F, the representative director, committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

3...

arrow